Monday is a national holiday to celebrate the life and achievements of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Across the nation, tributes will be paid to the man who taught us to dream – a man who was willing to go to jail to ensure that we could–and we would–overcome. In his honor, federal, state, and local governmental offices are closed on this day. His national influence is further observed via the many boulevards, parks and libraries named in his honor. Statues of him have been erected and his portrait hangs in colleges and universities. Schoolchildren read about his life and legacy.
So many honors for a man who inspired us to dream.
It’s been:
• almost seventy years since the most powerful Supreme Court decision on education: Brown v. Board of Education’s sweeping end to racial segregation.
• almost sixty years since the historic March on Washington that Dr. King led. One of the march’s key demands was the integration of students in our nation’s schoolhouses.
• some forty years since release of the landmark, “A Nation at Risk,” from the National Commission on Excellence in Education. Intended as a wakeup call, the report declared that “the educational foundations of our society are presently being eroded by a rising tide of mediocrity that threatens our very future as a nation and a people.”
So how do California’s African American students fare today after decades of a fight for equality? In education, we have failed dismally to realize his dream for African American children in the Golden State. Almost every year I have penned opinion pieces showcasing the continued disparities of educational opportunity and attainment for African American students. Sadly, since I first advocated for enhanced school choice while a member of the California State Senate, the needle has not affirmatively moved on behalf of African American students.
Consider these California Department of Education facts:
- Overall, the numbers of African American students enrolled in California’s public education system has significantly declined, from 334,652 boys and girls when I last wrote my column in 2019 to only 298,768 today–5.07% of the state’s 5,892,240 million students.
- in 2019 only 33% met or exceeded state adopted proficiency in English Language Arts (ELA); only 21% in Math. Today, those numbers have remained stagnant or even declined: still only 33% met or exceeded proficiency in ELA; only 16% in Math. Stated in a more shocking way, today 70% of African American students do not meet proficiency standards in English; 84% do not meet proficiency in Math.
Clearly, Governor Newsom, Superintendent Tony Thurmond—himself African American–and the Democratic-controlled California Legislature have failed California’s African American students. Yet, we continue to name schools in tribute to Dr. King. According to a perusal of the EdSource.org data base showing performance outcomes of all California schools, there are some thirty three schools named for Dr. King, including charter schools.
Undoubtedly, every school should excel. But naming a school for a national hero should bear an even greater expectation that all who enter that school should excel.
Yet, overwhelmingly, schools named for Dr. King fail to meet the academic benchmarks established by the state for English and Math proficiency. For example, the Martin Luther King, Jr. Elementary School in Santa Ana shows that only 19.55% of their students meet or exceed English Language Arts standards today–an actual decline of 2.27% from 2019—which had also similarly declined from the previous year! For Math, only 14.93% meet criteria, a decline of 7.08% from 2019!
From north to south, schools named for Dr. King post similar scores: At San Diego’s King-Chavez Academy of Excellence only 33.33% of students meet or exceed English standards, while only 12.88% reach Math standards—a shameful decline of 8.84% since 2019. Quite frankly, that governing school board might consider stripping the school of its “Excellence” name since this pattern has persisted for years.
At the San Bernardino Martin Luther King Middle School, only 23.24% meet English standards; only 11.53% meet Math standards—a shameful decline of 7.62% from its previous posting!
Certainly, standouts exist: the Martin Luther King Middle School in more affluent Berkeley proclaims that 71.77% of its students meet or exceed proficiency in English and 61.63% do so in Math (though they declined by 8.64% since 2019.
Other successful schools named in honor of Dr. King include Riverside’s Martin Luther King Jr. High School as well as the independent KIPP Charter School in San Lorenzo in Alameda County among a miniscule few other.
We can no longer simply attend feel-good ceremonial events on a Monday holiday and then allow our children to return to schools named for a national hero while we simply allow educational failure and persistent underperformance to continue. Any school named for Dr. King needs to become truly worthy of bearing his name.
And let’s not stop there. California has three schools named for former President Barack Obama, one for Former First Lady Michelle Obama, and Rosa Parks – the mother of the civil rights movement.
Not one school named for President Obama sees students scoring above 18.24% proficiency in English Language Arts, or 5.29% in Math—among the lowest proficiency rates anywhere in California. These are schools named for the former President who is often reported to be the most admired man in America. And the one school named for the most admired woman, Michelle Obama, only 30.85% are proficient in English Language Arts, 22.53% in Math. All schools have declined since 2019.
What of the mother of the Civil Rights Movement—Rosa Parks herself? There are seven schools named for her. Most fail her. For example, in the shadow of the State Capitol itself, the Rosa Parks Elementary School in Sacramento acknowledges that only 16.4% of its students meet English Language Arts standards; only 6.59% meet Math standards.
Harriet Tubman fares somewhat better: the one school named for her is in San Diego where only 32.82% are proficient in English; only 17.67% meet Math standards—a precipitous decline of 11.8% since 2019. Were Ms. Tubman alive today, she most likely would join us in launching an Education Underground Railway to rescue students from that—and other schools named by politicians to “feel good” about civil rights and diversity, yet which consistently fail on a day to day, year to year basis.
Public education—which consumes almost 50% of the entire California state budget and has done for years—needs not only change, but a complete overhaul. Tinkering with budget formulas is not sufficient. Bowing to the most powerful political interest in California—the California Teachers Association—can no longer be stomached.
Last year, I was proud to partner with former Ambassador Rick Grenell in seeking to advance education opportunity scholarships for the most impacted California students and I look forward to moving this agenda forward once again. Across the nation, parents are mobilizing for school choice and to truly be the architects of our children’s educational futures. Rather than Gov. Newsom bloviating about slavery reparations, the greatest slavery-remnant shackle he can break to set African Americans free is to break the chains of a cycle of education failure we have witnessed in California by embracing school choice and Opportunity Scholarships which will lead to education—finally–becoming a true key unlocking the American Dream.
Dr. King inspired us to act – to change our nation for the betterment of all. This year let’s stop the parades and banquets and all the lip service we have paid to Dr. King to focus on the tragedy of what has happened to our African American students in the very schools named to honor him. To honor Dr. King, let’s have the courage to take on vested status quo interests who prioritize our schools serving as a public works program rather than a public education system that shines equally for all. Park the Bullet Train to nowhere. Rather, it’s time for a new Underground Railroad to (educational) freedom. All aboard?
View Comments (6)
If MLK were alive today, he'd be labeled an Uncle Tom, maligned by the left, banned from the blue bird and the book of face and probably worse.
Disappointed is such a mild word. Probably more like enraged.
Ms. Romero may have some concerns about public education now, but she was part of the Democratic governance machine for quite a while. Here her efforts to make changes and point out long standing disparities in education are laudable, but this article is really weak on the demand for change.
The nuts and bolts of school operation- teachers, curriculum and management coupled with the engagement of parents and willing/prepared students need significant changes. I'll throw out a couple of simple things:
1. Stop promoting failing students to the next grade because it may injure their self esteem. Boo-hoo. Educators fail when the kid don't grow up with the very basic skill of reading. No reading= no job= a drain on society.
2. Stop teaching to the lowest common denominator. Some kids are more engaged than others, let them fly.
3. Parents need to make sure their children attend school (in person) and actually learn something like reading and mathematics.
The whole public school system and its funding need to be dismantled and rebuilt to allow charter, private and religious schools to compete for education dollars. If the Covid nonsense pointed out anything, it was the absolute sickly education system in California which, as a whole, is a total failure. The CTA and its bed-mate the weak and woke school administrations need to go.
We, all of us, will have no future without an educated populous.
Excuse me: Educators fail when the kids don't...
MLK correctly assessed that the most important beneficiaries of education should be the students. Teachers unions have entirely disagreed, particularly in California. The "pandemic" has been a wet dream for teachers - no accountability, no responsibility while retaining full wages and benefits.
Meanwhile the San Francisco “Reparations Committee” is proposing to pay each longtime black resident $5 million and grant them total debt forgiveness for suffering decades of “systemic repression" even though neither San Francisco, nor California, formally adopted the institution of slavery. What would MLK think of this?